Child molestation and pedophilia occur far more commonly among homosexuals than among heterosexuals on a per capita basis, according to a new study.
"Overwhelming evidence supports the belief that homosexuality is a sexual deviancy often accompanied by disorders that have dire consequences for our culture," wrote Steve Baldwin in, "Child Molestation and the Homosexual Movement," soon to be published by the Regent University Law Review.
Baldwin is the executive director of the Council for National Policy in Washington, D.C.
Oh! Oh! Shocking! Homosexuals! Evil! Dire consequences for culture! Save the children! (swoons)
Well, except:
Jay Heavener, spokesman for PFLAG – Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays, counters that federal crime data refute claims that homosexuals molest children at higher rates than heterosexuals.
(skip a few paragraphs)
In terms of sheer numbers, that may be true. But in terms of numbers of children abused per offender, homosexuals abuse with far greater frequency; and boys, research shows, are the much-preferred target.
Report: Pedophilia more common among 'gays', Research purports to reveal 'dark side' of homosexual culture
(blinks)
That’s not the same. Per capita per OFFENDER? Come on. Your opening sentence just said per capita. Misleading much?
I’m also confused as to what I’m supposed to do with this information. Perhaps what you are trying to say is that homosexuals as a group (NOT just homosexual offenders as a group) have a per capita rate of molesting children that is higher than the same heterosexual rate. Except you don’t say such, which leads me to believe that you don’t have the numbers to back up that claim.
I’m going to begin conducting random statistical studies of my own. For example, after doing a brief survey of those living in this apartment, I’ve found that the average American is an atheist vegetarian. The number of football games watched per individual is extremely high, but only if you consider only those who actually watch football (other members of the household just fall asleep beside the football watching individuals as they are watching games). Those with a higher rate of football watching are also far more likely to eat potato chips on the way home rather than waiting for dinner than those with a lower rate. There is obviously a clear link between potato chip consumption and football watching. Goodness, statistics is fun!
Pedophilia is the attraction to prepubescent children. Homosexuality is the attraction to people of the same gender. If we want to prevent child molestation, let’s work to prevent child molestation. Trying so hard to make tenuous links between your target age and target gender that you create misleading topic sentences and quote irrelevant statistics is a bit pitiful, eh?
Yes, yes, I realize that I should learn and just cease to read articles from worldnetdaily.com--- but what can I say? Clearly, not watching football leads to the masochistic tendency to read ridiculous news stories... and thus has dire consequences for our culture. I apologize for not doing my part.
2 comments:
In terms of sheer numbers, that may be true. But in terms of numbers of children abused per offender, homosexuals abuse with far greater frequency; and boys, research shows, are the much-preferred target.
So let's see here. Heterosexuals abuse more kids total than homosexuals, but homosexual abusers abuse more kids each than homosexual abusers. Unless the homosexual ones are all sharing their victims via the Great Gay Underground Child Sex Slave Railroad, it follows that there are fewer homosexual abusers than heterosexual ones. That's...pretty much the opposite of what WorldNutDaily would like to prove, isn't it? Alas for their math skills.
And duh, of course boys are the preferred target of homosexual abusers. Like heterosexual abusers, they're predominantly male. Be safe--let a lesbian babysit your kid!
Also from that article:
"Research on the homosexual lifestyle confirms it is almost exclusively a youth-oriented culture," Baldwin wrote. "Very few gays exhibit preference for older men."
Unsurprisingly this is wrong, even when restricted to gay men (as is implicitly done above), but never mind that. The important thing is that God-fearing straight Americans can't possibly be interested in children, because heterosexual culture is completely non-youth oriented. Why, our most popular stars are all ancient hags. Like Britney Spears and Lindsay Lohan. Why do you think celebrities pay thousands of dollars to get their hair prematurely grayed and their faces wrinkled?
Alas for their math skills.
Indeed. A precarious grip on statistics is a dangerous thing... especially when you makes it sound plausible enough that people who know practically nothing about statistics (most people) think that you know what you're talking about.
Statistics don’t lie. People manipulate statistics to support their lies. Other people believe them. (sigh)
I loved the points on the youth-culture worship claims. I shall have to begin saving up my money for artificial graying.
Post a Comment